Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  84 / 94 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 84 / 94 Next Page
Page Background

/84/

Market

Trends and

Insights

The Israeli banking and finance sector has been the focal point of regulatory and popular

attention in recent years, following the markets crisis in 2008 as well as local defaulting

debtors with high public exposure.

It is worth pointing out that the credit defaults that drew much public and regulatory

attention had a relatively limited effect on the composition and profitability of the public

savings but the actual influence of the defaults on the regulatory side were significant.

The economic conditions, increasing appetite for risk appetite and regulatory

inconsistency combine to support a thriving and diverse market, where the balances of

yield and risk change among different types of lenders, and the structure and form of

transactions may be influenced by the regulatory requirements that apply to different

lenders.

Banking sector participants and competition

Large Borrowers and Loans

In this segment, credits are offered by banks, institutional lenders such as insurance

companies and provident funds, as well as leverage funds and other investment funds

and other lending firms (focusing mostly on short term lending). All of these players

compete with the capital markets, which offer – for suitable borrowers – an opportunity

to raise debt on competitive terms.

The introduction of private lending services by institutional lenders was, unsurprisingly,

not welcomed by the local banks. Banks have rightfully pointed out the inconsistent

regulation,which imposes greater,andmore costly,requirements on banks in comparison

to the regulation facing institutional lenders. It is fair to say, that although the regulatory

requirements applicable to institutional lenders have been developing, it has not reached

the level of the regulation imposed on the banks. In addition to the unfairness of this

regulatory inconsistency, it has been implied that it resulted in institutional loans being

inferior in their quality to bank loans. This implication is doubtful. However, it is evident

that private loans, whether originated by banks or by institutional investors, have been

relatively more secured and incurred lower losses than capital markets debt (publicly

Formanyyears,the roleof extendingcredit tobusinesseshasbeenconcentrated

in the local banking sector. Although this remains true for consumer loans, this

is certainly not the case today for the corporate market.